Current:Home > reviewsColorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause -Stellar Wealth Sphere
Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause
View
Date:2025-04-18 02:03:00
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case.
“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters. His campaign said it was working on a response to the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.
The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
“You’d be saying a rebel who took up arms against the government couldn’t be a county sheriff, but could be the president,” attorney Jason Murray said in arguments before the court in early December.
veryGood! (21982)
Related
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Judge declines to delay Trump’s NY hush money trial over complaints of pretrial publicity
- No, you aren't likely to get abs in 30 days. Here's how long it actually takes.
- 1 dead after shuttle bus crashes at a Honolulu cruise ship terminal
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Does drinking your breast milk boost immunity? Kourtney Kardashian thinks so.
- Officer who fatally shot Kawaski Trawick 5 years ago won’t be disciplined, police commissioner says
- Search continues in Maine as officer is charged with lying about taking missing person to hospital
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- The Daily Money: 'Can you hear me?' Hang up.
Ranking
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Tiger Woods shoots career-worst round at Masters to fall out of contention
- Washington Capitals' Nick Jensen leaves game on stretcher after being shoved into boards
- Roku says 576,000 streaming accounts compromised in recent security breach
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- 55 US Coast Guard cadets disciplined after cheating scandal for copying homework answers
- Eleanor Coppola, Emmy-winning filmmaker and Francis Ford Coppola's wife, dies at 87
- Denver shuts out Boston College 2-0 to win record 10th men's college hockey title
Recommendation
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
This week on Sunday Morning (April 14): The Money Issue
Masters weekend has three-way tie and more forgiving conditions. It also has Tiger Woods
Clint Eastwood Makes Rare Appearance to Support Jane Goodall
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
Small earthquake shakes Southern California desert during Coachella music festival
Utah school board member who questioned a student’s gender loses party nomination for reelection
What we learned covering O.J. Simpson case: We hardly know the athletes we think we know